Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 






On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 3, 2014, at 2:03 PM, Dale R. Worley <worley@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Unfortunately, "my bank, my doctor, my brokerage" have all implemented
> confidential email, but they are horrible webmail systems.  That means
> that a considerable amount of the benefit that will be obtainable from
> confidential email is already being obtained, making it harder for
> proper confidential email to gain acceptance in the market.

Actually it's not being obtained.   These systems work quite poorly, and typically aren't all that secure.   I do not think they are widely used by customers, because their usability is so bad.

They are not secure at present.

But there is considerable money available to make them secure.

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]