Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp-04.txt> (Encapsulating MPLS in UDP) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Greg Daley <gdaley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Noel Chiappa'" <jnc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "ietf@xxxxxxxx" <ietf@xxxxxxxx>, "mpls@xxxxxxxx" <mpls@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp-04.txt> (Encapsulating MPLS in UDP) to Proposed Standard
From: Stewart Bryant <stbryant@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 10:50:54 +0000
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <72381AF1F18BAE4F890A0813768D992817FDAB19@sdcexchms.au.logicalis.com>
Reply-to: stbryant@xxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0

On 30/01/2014 22:44, Greg Daley wrote:

Of course, in order to get the protocols to pass legacy firewallinspection, UDP encapsulation may be required, and companies wouldhave to actually implement the protocol... Greg Daleygdaley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

So UDP/DCCP/MPLS ?

Stewart

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp-04.txt> (Encapsulating MPLS in UDP) to Proposed Standard
  - From: l.wood

References:
- Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp-04.txt> (Encapsulating MPLS in UDP) to Proposed Standard
  - From: Noel Chiappa
- RE: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp-04.txt> (Encapsulating MPLS in UDP) to Proposed Standard
  - From: Greg Daley

Prev by Date: Re: When is an idea a good idea?
Next by Date: RE: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp-04.txt> (Encapsulating MPLS in UDP) to Proposed Standard
Previous by thread: RE: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp-04.txt> (Encapsulating MPLS in UDP) to Proposed Standard
Next by thread: RE: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp-04.txt> (Encapsulating MPLS in UDP) to Proposed Standard
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]