> Actually, I think I convinced Barry that it is updating RFC 2683. Yes: because the new line-length-limit recommendation is meant to apply whether or not condstore or qresync are in play, this "updates" remains (it's the others that used to be there that we scrubbed). I think David's right that some version of what Eliot said: > there > is a requirement for strict syntax parsing. If the client blows it in > any way, the server SHOULD return an error with a BAD response. ...should be added to the section about the line-length limit. A sentence or two should do nicely. Barry