Re: Gen-Art telechat review of draft-farrell-perpass-attack-04

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "dcrocker@xxxxxxxx Crocker" <dcrocker@xxxxxxxx>, Scott Brim <scott.brim@xxxxxxxxx>, Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Gen-Art telechat review of draft-farrell-perpass-attack-04
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 22:48:41 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@xxxxxxxx>, "draft-farrell-perpass-attack.all@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <draft-farrell-perpass-attack.all@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <52DEFAEE.3000900@dcrocker.net>
Thread-index: AQHPF8QYhZ89fpHxYEaxPXxqNJZteQ==
Thread-topic: Gen-Art telechat review of draft-farrell-perpass-attack-04

Sam,

FWIW my view is pretty much what Dave and Scott noted. I don't think the change weakens the draft's message: We'll take the issue seriously.

Jari

<<attachment: smime.p7s>>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Gen-Art telechat review of draft-farrell-perpass-attack-04
  - From: Sam Hartman

References:
- Gen-Art telechat review of draft-farrell-perpass-attack-04
  - From: Scott Brim
- Re: Gen-Art telechat review of draft-farrell-perpass-attack-04
  - From: Jari Arkko
- Re: Gen-Art telechat review of draft-farrell-perpass-attack-04
  - From: Eliot Lear
- Re: Gen-Art telechat review of draft-farrell-perpass-attack-04
  - From: Stephen Farrell
- Re: Gen-Art telechat review of draft-farrell-perpass-attack-04
  - From: Sam Hartman
- Re: Gen-Art telechat review of draft-farrell-perpass-attack-04
  - From: Dave Crocker

Prev by Date: Re: Gen-Art telechat review of draft-farrell-perpass-attack-04
Next by Date: Re: Problem with new Note Well
Previous by thread: Re: Gen-Art telechat review of draft-farrell-perpass-attack-04
Next by thread: Re: Gen-Art telechat review of draft-farrell-perpass-attack-04
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]