Hi Dave, At 09:39 09-01-2014, Dave Cridland wrote: >Much as I adore the almost wonderful irony of "The IESG" having an >address of <noreply@xxxxxxxx> - especially in the light of John's >closing comment there - many MUAs will then cheerfully offer that as >an address for "The IESG".
:-)
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg78806.html
>If that is a dev-null address, as noreply@ often implies, it'll >become a self-fulfilling prophecy of sorts. You might want a >different phrase, there - "IESG Announcements", or something.
My guess about the problem is that people choose "Reply to All". That generates more mail for iesg-secretary@. Using a few (sieve) rules might alleviate the problem.
There's even a sieve draft in WGLC that may be relevant: draft-ietf-appsawg-sieve-duplicate-02.txt Ned