Re: [lisp] [tsvwg] Milestones changed for tsvwg WG

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Zero UDP checksums are being selected for convenience, without an appreciation
> of the overall effects and  costs on other traffic. I see this is occurring in both tsvwg
> and lisp, and it's probably happening elsewhere:

For the LISP working group, or at least for this author, Zero UDP checksums were selected out of practicality, performance practicality.

Dino






[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]