> I'm reminded of a discussion (probably on this list) some time ago > when kre reminded me that all RFCs can be updated or obsoleted in the > future by subsequent RFCs. I read this draft in a different sense, in > that the text in this draft is a description of a here and now state > of affairs that will presumably exist in the future until updated or > obsoleted by a subsequent RFC, much the same as the fate of RFC2050 I > suppose. wrong venue. should you want to non-ietf parts of the iana function, you do not want to go through the ietf process. randy
Attachment:
pgpe8NyxP6ImZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature