On 01/01/2014 22:08, Ted Lemon wrote:
This argument boils down to "ADs can abuse process, so we ought not to
ever publish a document that might provide process for them to abuse.
Ted, I believe the point is that the AD concerned would not be abusing
the process, they would simply be making a different judgement call, or
a stricter interpretation (for what ever reason) of the in place PM
requirements than the authors and preceding reviewers of the text.
The -03 text is a significant improvement, but I still fear the impact
of single issue technical politics on the output of our document stream.
Stewart