* Sam Hartman wrote: >Listening to the discussion between Stephen Farrell and Stephen Kent, >I've realized that I do not believe the the current draft clearly >indicates that the big change here is that we need to consider what >happens when monitoring happens along many paths or kat multiple points >along a path. I believe that Stephen Farrell clearly explained the >difference and change to Stephen Kent. I agree with that explanation >and believe the draft would be improved by clearly capturing that. I do not really read this in Stephen Farrell's response and I am not in fact sure what you mean. <draft-farrell-perpass-attack-02.txt>, for all I can tell, is telling us that Google Analytics is an attack. The above sounds more like it would not be okay for the IETF to design some onion routing protocol without considering an adversary that can see the raw bits of 99% of publicly routed IP packets and analyse them in real time. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@xxxxxxxxxxxx · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/