* Cullen Jennings (fluffy) wrote: >Let me try and answer what I think is your central issue here which is: >why are we spending any time on this topic. > >We have heard from a significant number of people that they think it is >important for WebRTC devices and applicaitons to be able to know that >video will work between devices. It was the number one requested item >when speaking to the various developers with products demonstrated at >WebRTC Expo and a significant issue on this email list. It is one of the >several topics the chairs are driving forward. We plan to continue to do >try to drive it to resolution. Note resolution includes consensus for no >MTI. To me, an important point is that some people are now investigating some alternative options that have not been given much consideration before, like the data points and samples regarding H.261 that have been sent to the group's mailing list recently, which may open up new ways to find a consensus. I think a straw poll is much more useful in this situation than a vote or giving up. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@xxxxxxxxxxxx · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/