Re: The "nomap" Network Identifier Suffix

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Nov 26, 2013, at 3:13 PM, Richard Barnes <rlb@xxxxxx> wrote:
> The evil bit is ridiculous because evil people have no incentive to set it (thus nobody would ever look for it to be set).  With the _nomap suffix, the people who would need to set it have an incentive to do so, and at least in certain cases, the entities that might consume it have incentives to obey it as well.

Yup.   Google certainly paid a high price recently for doing something analogous to ignoring this suffix.






[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]