Re: Last Call: <C> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Larry Masinter <masinter@xxxxxxxxx>, IETF Discussion <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <C> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 08:07:06 -0800
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C68CB012D9182D408CED7B884F441D4D348260C1AE@nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0

On 11/4/13 7:52 AM, Larry Masinter wrote:

> For me, "rough consensus" and "running code" should be taken
> together, not independently. I've always taken it as "rough consensus
> OF THOSE WITH running code".

Larry, that is awesome!

/psa

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Last Call: <C> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC
  - From: Ted Lemon

References:
- RE: Last Call: <C> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC
  - From: Larry Masinter

Prev by Date: Re: Last Call: <C> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC
Next by Date: Re: Anti-harassment policy and ombudsperson
Previous by thread: Re: Last Call: <C> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC
Next by thread: Re: Last Call: <C> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]