Re: connection limits, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-24

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



A huge number of connections might be problematic for a 2.0 intermediary/proxy talking to an HTTP 1.1 server.

Not sure that should be dealt with in the spec.

Peter

On Oct 30, 2013, at 1:50 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@xxxxxx> wrote:

> On 2013-10-30 09:31, S Moonesamy wrote:
>> Hi Julian,
>> At 09:03 29-10-2013, Julian Reschke wrote:
>>> I have trouble parsing this comment. Do you see an issue here?
>> 
>> I read the text again (Section 6.4).  It is difficult to say what is
>> deemed abusive.  You could get around that with, for example:
>> 
>>   A client SHOULD limit the number of simultaneous open connections
>>   that it maintains to a given server as each connection consumes
>>   server resources.
>> 
>> Please note that I used some text from the third paragraph of that section.
> 
> Well, there are more reasons for limiting the connection; that's why we have a separate paragraph about it. Just moving one of them up here doesn't look like an improvement to me.
> 
> Best regards, Julian
> 






[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]