Re: [apps-discuss] content inspection in absence of media type, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2013-10-30 09:51, "Martin J. Dürst" wrote:
I have to say that I don't consider this sentence to be useless.

As far as I remember, there are other specs (mail?) that say that
text/plain is the default. So some implementers may be used to this, and
apply it to http, too.

Also, while every natural language text has to assume that the reader
uses a certain amount of rational thinking, specs are usually written
with a somewhat reduced expectation in that respect, not because the
average reader is particularly dumb, but because the consequences of
interpreting something wrong are different than the consequences of
getting something wrong when e.g. reading a novel.

So I don't see any reason for not keeping that sentence. Even if it
doesn't help, it definitely doesn't hurt.

So what exactly does it mean in *practice* to treat something as "arbitrary data". What do you expect a browser to do in that case?

Best regards, Julian





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]