On 30/10/2013 08:56, Noel Chiappa wrote: > > From: Eliot Lear <lear@xxxxxxxxx> > > > And having chaired NSRG > > It might be worth observing that NSRG was focused on new namespaces for the > lower-middle part of the stack (e.g. TCP endpoint names), whereas I get > the impression from Jari's note that that was about names further up > (application, etc). > > But maybe I got an incorrect impression? I don't think so, but since we have broken the layer 3/4 namespace in various ways, and are at severe risk of breaking the layer 7 namespace too, not to mention the mapping between them, it's hard to separate the two discussions. Brian