RE: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



because Amanda espouses a viewpoint you agree with?

http://www.technologywoman.com/2013/03/24/digging-beneath-the-surface-that-amanda-blum-article-on-adria-richards-is-not-what-it-seems/

Lloyd Wood
http://sat-net.com/L.Wood/


________________________________________
From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Fred Baker (fred) [fred@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 22 October 2013 10:51
To: Theodore Ts'o
Cc: <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy

> One hint --- we should definitely try to pursuade folks not to try to
> get a decision based on the specific facts of a particulate dispute
> via the court of public opinion:
>
>       "Adria Richards, PyCon, and How We All Lost"
>       http://amandablumwords.wordpress.com/2013/03/21/

Hmm. I might want to hear more from Amanda Blum.





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]