RE: Anonymous postings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



You say that, "Brian". You respond, "SM".

A persistent identifier is helpful in sustained shared multiparty conversation; whether it represents a "real" person or not does not matter.

And who are "we"?

"L."


________________________________________
From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of SM [sm@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 21 October 2013 21:18
To: Brian E Carpenter
Cc: ietf@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Anonymous postings

At 12:05 21-10-2013, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>1. We shouldn't tolerate anonymous postings in any case.

There is a thread at
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/current/msg05855.html and
one at http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg81133.html

It is better to focus on the content instead of the messenger.

Regards,
-sm






[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]