Re: Gen-ART LC/Telechat Review of draft-ietf-jcardcal-jcard-04

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le 2013-07-22 13:55, Philipp Kewisch a écrit :
>> -- 3.2.1.1:
>>
>> What happens for future versions of vCard? Do you simply use the new version number, or would we need a new version of this spec? I suspect the latter. If true, it might be worth mentioning that, or somewhere early in the draft mention that this spec is for vCard 4.0 only.
> I'd love to hear from the WG here, but given vCard 5.0 can at least in
> theory be completely different, I think the correct thing to do would be
> to restrict this jCard document to 4.x and when 5.x comes around create
> a revision of the document. Of course the text could be changed so that
> its "valid until revised by another document", in case the changes in
> 5.x are minor enough that no change in jCard is needed.
> 
> In any case, there should be a text change that any 4.x revision is
> allowed. For example, I recently read a suggestion for signed vCards
> that might use a version "4.0s".

I'd prefer "valid until revised by another document", which is
equivalent to not saying anything since that's how RFCs work. Therefore,
my suggestion would be to simply remove this sentence: "Similarly, the
value of the version property MUST be "4.0"."

Simon




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]