Wrt privacy in general... On 07/20/2013 02:56 PM, John C Klensin wrote: > Any volunteers > to get in front of the mic lines? I'd welcome that discussion. I'd love to see us have a BCP61-like [1] RFC on the topic of privacy and I also reckon that that'd help short-cut a number of IETF LCs and IESG DISCUSSes. (For example the Forwarded HTTP header and WebFinger both caused extensive discussions.) FWIW, my personal preference would be that such a BCP would attempt to make our work be more privacy friendly and by default though I'm not quite how how best to try achieve that though. But, even if the outcome wasn't a BCP along the lines I'd prefer, I think such a beast would still be worth having if it meant we could avoid a whole lot of these kinds of similar discussions on individual drafts. S. [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/bcp61