Sanjay, A comment from an old-timer: if you want to understand the IETF as a whole, put your priority on the Newcomer's orientation. There's plenty of time in the future to understand details of the IETF's administration. Unfortunately, clashes between interesting sessions are unavoidable at the IETF, because there is just too much going on. If they move the IAOC overview again, it will clash with something else, even on Sunday. Regards Brian Carpenter On 19/07/2013 08:14, Mishra, Sanjay wrote: > Moving IAOC Overview session now conflicts with Newcomer's orientation. The original schedule for IAOC conflicted only for the 2nd hour with newcomer meet and greet and I had figured to attend at least the first hour but now the IAOC session overlaps fully with Newcomer's orientation so those first time attendees like me will have to likely pick newcomer orientation over IAOC overview which if not conflicting would have been helpful. > > Is it possible to start sooner on Sunday? > > Thanks > Sanjay > > -----Original Message----- > From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of ietf-request@xxxxxxxx > Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 8:33 PM > To: ietf@xxxxxxxx > Subject: Ietf Digest, Vol 62, Issue 57 > > If you have received this digest without all the individual message attachments you will need to update your digest options in your list subscription. To do so, go to > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > > Click the 'Unsubscribe or edit options' button, log in, and set "Get MIME or Plain Text Digests?" to MIME. You can set this option globally for all the list digests you receive at this point. > > > > Send Ietf mailing list submissions to > ietf@xxxxxxxx > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > ietf-request@xxxxxxxx > > You can reach the person managing the list at > ietf-owner@xxxxxxxx > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Ietf digest..." >