RE: Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc5451bis-09

["Peter Yee" <peter@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Murray,

                Quick response!  My replies are found below.

 

                Thanks.

 

                                -Peter

 

From: Murray S. Kucherawy [mailto:superuser@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 12:13 AM
To: Peter Yee
Cc: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc5451bis.all@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; General Area Review Team; ietf
Subject: Re: Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc5451bis-09

 

Hi Peter, thanks for the review.  Comments inline:

On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 10:38 PM, Peter Yee <peter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Page 5, 2nd paragraph after bullet item, 1st sentence: change "pre-standards
DomainKeys defined" to "pre-standard DomainKeys-defined".

 

This doesn't seem to work.  The sentence is basically "SPF defined X and DomainKeys defined Y."  "defined" is a verb, not an adjective, so I don't think the hyphen is appropriate.

 

Hmm.  Yup, I misread that.  Just ignore the hyphen part of the comment.
 

Page 20, 5th full paragraph, 3rd sentence: regarding whether the field can
be "trusted": why would the MUA check the field in any other location than
prior to the top-most trace field?  If the location is the source of
trustedness, then the MUA shouldn't be checking it anywhere else, right?

 

Page 32, section 8.6, 3rd sentence: regarding keeping the list "current",
how about using a new RRType in the DNS?

 

That's certainly one option to solve that problem. However, I'd prefer not to suggest new mechanisms that haven't been deployed yet.

Fair enough.

I'll post the rest in a -10 revision after the telechat, or if directed to do so sooner.

Thanks again,

-MSK