-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 > For SCTP we did a number of interoperability tests, which were > face to face meetings and the people who were developing stacks > we there. This events were always very helpful not only for improving > the stacks but also for improving the IETF documents. > I also developed a test tool for conformance testing based on some > test descriptions provided by ETSI. However, it would have made sense to > specify also some tests within the IETF. That can also help to clarify > some protocol aspects and to focus on "common mistakes". > Providing tests is a very good thing in my experience. Unfortunately, > at the point we did this for SCTP, the IETF position was that testing > isn't an objective. Maybe it is time to change that... > > Best regards > Michael I guess the code you wrote for your online test cases was your own work and you didn't re-use some else's test framework? The SCTP case is also a bit simpler than the OAuth scenario since in SCTP might have only tested client-server interactions (right?) Ciao Hannes -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJRzcSCAAoJEGhJURNOOiAt064H/3iowM2lBBunk58jOq1/eAfK Cy+y+dpEqJoXeqMI7RLtTsXXDbblxI83cxO6OXol7HU37elmomdiD7qGg2KPeeOJ 1GyEWnXXJ1oaC9AcWAkPiRan2EhdXGxu6yWG1iuHniOSkC3WvU9nhVU8PLUkSPwB WSzh4hsj6tnTpR67oYoHkDwtQsFuvcvxiYkNV9rI3fy+FIXJ5ygf9UPmgVJpNqIx azmc8W9iWUUeGGnaU+/2APRybe8PpCZf6y+QKVFA/6Zkai86/HfTaDFdAnL/eOXV xhdXjHsn8Ci4CkCXJ7Pn2JRpIYX1y7ccMOvu8WHuvJnSQ2S091/EFHBY2w/Wydk= =vU1M -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----