Re: documenting feedback of meeting venues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



AB,

Thanks for the reminder.

We have starting putting the post meeting survey results online.  See:

  http://iaoc.ietf.org/surveys.html

IETF 70, 68, 65, 64 are there now.  The IAD will add IETF 80 through 86 later this week this week and earlier meetings after that.

Bob


On Jun 23, 2013, at 1:12 PM, Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Bob Hinden, and IETF management
> 
> I attended a presentation of IAOC in IETF last-meeting. I have send
> you the below message which you did not reply so far (was waiting for
> three months). Please note that this is my last reminder (will wait
> only two weeks). I was remotely attending your talk in the last IETF
> meeting, and I asked a question but you or someone refered me to post
> on the list and that I will get reply. Please note I still did not get
> a reply and that I think was ignored by the presenters of such work. I
> don't think the community can be ignored.
> 
> AB
> I usually give a communication delay tolerance time for about three
> months because people may be busy, but don't forget my requests :-)
> 
> On 3/10/13, Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> To: Bob Hinden, (presented at IAOC overview)
>> 
>> My question to Bob; why not document the feedback (of meeting venues) of
>> community of past for the future?
>> 
>> I recommend to change the IAOC procedure, to allow documentation?
>> 
>> AB
>> 






[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]