Re: Content-free Last Call comments

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 8:45 PM, Pete Resnick <presnick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It's interesting to see that people are interpreting me to mean I want more text. I don't. I want less. Save your breath. 

Well, this thread is surely evidence that you don't always get what you want.

But more seriously, what are you expecting Russ to do? What did you want him to write?

If your answer is "Nothing", then how do you read IETF consensus for a document that gets no response in its Last Call? The XSF's stance is often "It got nothing in Last Call, it shouldn't advance", which seems reasonable to me - I don't think defaulting to publication is right - certainly not in every case.

My suggestion was simply to ask for what you want in the Last Call.

But I imagine you could also just start an endless thread on an already overloaded list until someone guesses the answer.

Dave.

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]