Continue Reply to your request dated 24/05/2013 Draft Reviewed By: Abdussalam Baryun (AB) Dated:02/06/2013 Reviewed I-D: draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-sec-threats-03 Reviewer Comment A2: Referencing the NHDP and related to RFC6130 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ I think if we got an effort in IETF to update NHDP [RFC6130] as draft [1] does, why this reviewed I-D of threats does not include [1] in its references to be reviewed before reviewing this NHDP-threat I-D? I suggest to include draft [1] in References section, IMHO, any updates to RFC6130 should be considered by the community while reviewing this I-D. [1] draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-olsrv2-sec-02 AB > On 5/24/13, The IESG <iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> The IESG has received a request from the Mobile Ad-hoc Networks WG >> (manet) to consider the following document: >> - 'Security Threats for NHDP' >> <draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-sec-threats-03.txt> as Informational RFC >> >> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits >> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the >> ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2013-06-06. Exceptionally, comments may be >> sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the >> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. >> >> Abstract >> >> This document analyses common security threats of the Neighborhood >> Discovery Protocol (NHDP), and describes their potential impacts on >> MANET routing protocols using NHDP. >> >> The file can be obtained via >> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-sec-threats/ >> >> IESG discussion can be tracked via >> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-sec-threats/ballot/ >> >> >> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. >> _______________________________________________ >> manet mailing list >> manet@xxxxxxxx >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet >> >