On 5/24/13 11:24 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
On 05/24/2013 11:21 AM, joel jaeggli wrote:
The consistent feedback regarding non-conflict as long as I been
involved in this tends to indicate otherwise. 18-months to 2 years seems
much more reasonable to me personally.
Joel,
You're making several fundamental mistakes in your thinking. Rather
than focusing on all the reasons you think it cannot happen, why not
take the suggestion for what it was (it would be nice if we could do ...),
probably because I've been involved in the planning loop since 44.
and let the folks who actually do the scheduling decide if the idea is
worth pursuing, and if so if it is possible.
Doug