Re: IETF, ICANN and Whois (Was Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01.txt> (The Internet Numbers Registry System) to Informational RFC)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Olivier,
At 03:00 21-05-2013, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond wrote:
And you do NOT need to be part of an At-Large Structure to participate
in the At-Large Working Groups. Membership is only needed for matters of
voting - and since we operate by consensus, that's a rare occurrence,
usually only kept to selection of leadership.

The voting and consensus part reminds me of the ITU. The vote that happened last year has been the subject of numerous comments.

I know this is a shameless plug but in the face of the threat posed by
non-multi-stakeholder systems of governance, I felt a follow-up on
Steve's post was necessary. As Steve says so eloquently, we need to all
work toward the goal of an open, innovative, expanding Internet.

I don't see any threat. What I see are words defined or redefined to suit the interests of the day.

Regards,
-sm




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]