On 2013-05-21, at 11:50, Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 05/21/2013 11:46 AM, joel jaeggli wrote: >> >> With respect to the question of proposed standard. What changes if the requested status is informational? > > I think just get rid of the normative language - SHOULDs, MUSTs, etc. >From the perspective of giving guidance to people implementing these RRTypes, it seems to me that the normative language is useful, perhaps even necessary, to ensure interoperability. I admit I have not done my homework here; is the suggestion that the 2119 normative language cannot (MUST NOT? :-) appear in an informational document? Joe