Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I'll say that about a year and a half ago I found myself pushing back on discusses
that in my opinion clearly were not within the discuss criteria
significantly more than I ever had to do as an AD. My role was as WG
chair/editor.

Interestingly it's been less of an issue in my experience lately.

Definitely not statistically significant data set for any of this.




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]