Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: dcrocker@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process
From: Joe Touch <touch@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 13:46:21 -0700
Cc: "Cullen Jennings \(fluffy\)" <fluffy@xxxxxxxxx>, IETF list <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <519271F5.4020202@dcrocker.net>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5



On 5/14/2013 10:18 AM, Dave Crocker wrote:

And a Discuss should be required to assert which criteria apply and how.


+1

Joe

References:
- call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process
  - From: Jari Arkko
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process
  - From: Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process
  - From: Dave Crocker

Prev by Date: Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process
Next by Date: Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process
Previous by thread: Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process
Next by thread: Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]