Re: Gen-art telechat review: draft-ietf-6renum-gap-analysis-06.txt (updated for -07)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/10/2013 8:12 AM, Robert Sparks wrote:
Thanks Bing -

The updates make the document better, and I appreciate the resolution of
referencing Tim's expired draft.

So the solution is to not reference it? I see the name of the draft is
mentioned in the acknowledgments as:
 [draft-chown-v6ops-renumber-thinkabout].

Shouldn't it then be an informational reference? It doesn't make sense
to me to mention a draft in the text and not have a reference.

Stig





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]