DKIM is Harmful as Specified

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "ietf@xxxxxxxx IETF" <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: DKIM is Harmful as Specified
From: Douglas Otis <doug.mtview@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 12 May 2013 11:00:01 -0700
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Dear ietf,

To better clarify elements within otis-ipv6-email-authent draft, a separate I-D is focused primarily on DKIM.

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-otis-dkim-harmful-00

Regards,

Douglas Otis

Follow-Ups:
- Re: DKIM is Harmful as Specified
  - From: Murray S. Kucherawy

Prev by Date: Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01.txt> (The Internet Numbers Registry System) to Informational RFC
Next by Date: Re: [ietf-dkim] Last Call: Change the status of DKIM (RFC 6376) to Internet Standard
Previous by thread: Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01.txt> (The Internet Numbers Registry System) to Informational RFC
Next by thread: Re: DKIM is Harmful as Specified
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]