Re: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01
From: Randy Bush <randy@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 21:53:01 +0200
Cc: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ietf@xxxxxxxx, netmod@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <6.2.5.6.2.20130508092054.0c02f378@resistor.net>
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)

>    "The domain-name type represents a DNS domain name.  The
>     name SHOULD be fully qualified whenever possible."
> 
> That sounds like a MAY.

MAY != SHOULD

Follow-Ups:
- Re: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01
  - From: S Moonesamy

References:
- Re: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01
  - From: S Moonesamy

Prev by Date: Re: Accessing tools from IETF pages
Next by Date: Re: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01
Previous by thread: Re: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01
Next by thread: Re: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]