Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/05/13 08:00, Hannes Tschofenig allegedly wrote:
> while it is desirable to get wider reviews happen earlier in the process
> there is obviously a challenge: You don't want to ask for reviews before
> the document is stable and you cannot ask many times since good reviews
> are "expensive".

There have been several attempts at defining "snapshot" review points,
but afaict working groups rarely feel like a draft is ready for review
until they think it's finished.






[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]