>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Narten <narten@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Thomas> The current cycle too often seems to be more like "new
Thomas> version posted". Wait if anyone reviews. Some reviews
Thomas> eventually, maybe. Oh, IETF meeting coming, time for a
Thomas> revision. But with meeting approaching, there are a zillion
Thomas> docs and cycles are limited. Rather haphazard, with too
Thomas> many documents effectively only being revised once per
Thomas> meeting cycle.
I would like to suggest that the IESG Review be done in public on the WG
mailing list. I've been a WG co-chair for just over a year now, and
I'm truly astounded by what happens behind the scenes.
It's not the substance, it's the quantity, and the lack of WG view of
it. I think that this substantially and quite negatively contributes
to the "fix it during IESG review", and therefore to the IESG workload.
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [
] mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
Attachment:
pgpsOGmLHkbAJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature