Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



 In your previous mail you wrote:

>  We want the highest quality documents possible for developers to
>  translate into implementations.

=> I am afraid this statement is not fully consistent.

Regards

Francis.Dupont@xxxxxxxxxx

PS: note it is not an attack against you: in fact you gave a good summary
of the deeper issue.




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]