Re: [spfbis] [dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Hector,
At 14:15 29-04-2013, Hector Santos wrote:
If anyone wishes to see one aspect of what is wrong with IETF Diversity, then see whats going on in SPF BIS WG where a key IETF cog essentially attempts to shutdown discussions and communications, attacks posters which by my estimate were making progress.

Progress is a status quo - DON'T CHANGE THE RFC4408 SPECIFICATION in SPFBIS.

Many in DNS community do not agree with the change of removing a long term migration path to a SPF RRTYPE. In fact, not changing the existing specification would end the issue and hopefully satisfy all principles.

The following messages were posted to the SPFBIS mailing list:

http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spfbis/current/msg03593.html
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spfbis/current/msg03598.html

It has also been mentioned that there are two long threads at:

http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spfbis/current/msg03412.html
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext/current/msg13025.html

Regards,
S. Moonesamy




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]