On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
1. DRM is a fact of life, and it is therefore better that there should
be a well-formulated standard than a free-for-all. A free-for-all is a
guaranteed route to non-interoperability.
Crack cocaine, prostitution, and political corruption are also facts of life.
OK, pardon the cheap shot, but I don’t think SDOs that have some sort of stewardship relationship to the Internet should ever play any part whatsoever in the facilitation of DRM.
I won’t consume your input bandwidth by backing up this position; the arguments pro and contra DRM are not exactly secret, and I haven’t heard any new ones in some years. -T
I won’t consume your input bandwidth by backing up this position; the arguments pro and contra DRM are not exactly secret, and I haven’t heard any new ones in some years. -T