Joe, In my address book I also have ise@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx and n.brownlee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx both cc'ed here. Looking at http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-touch-tcp-ao-nat/ the I-D state is "Response to Review Needed" as you noted. I don't have an key to the ISE states, but this one would seem to be plain English. The History tab doesn't show more than the I-D revisions and state changes so I can't tell when the review came in or whether there was a subsequent review. The ISE is, of course, out of the remit of the IESG, but you might try asking the IAB if they have a lever. Adrian > -----Original Message----- > From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Joe > Touch > Sent: 10 April 2013 17:23 > To: Nevil Brownlee > Cc: IETF discussion list > Subject: Re: question about draft-touch-tcp-ao-nat > > Hi, Nevil (and the IETF list, now). > > This is my third attempt at requesting clarification about the status of > this document. I have been trying to reach you since November. > > Since you have not responded to any of my previous posts, I'm cc'ing the > IETF list, which I sincerely hope you track. > > For the IETF list - if anyone knows why these sort of questions are not > being answered, please post. > > Thanks, > > Joe > > On 3/20/2013 10:05 AM, Joe Touch wrote: > > Hi, Nevil, > > > > I sent this message back in November; the current version addresses all > > received comments. I do not know of any pending comments that have not > > been addressed. > > > > Can you please clarify the change of state yesterday from "None" to > > "Response to Review Needed"? > > > > AFAICT, the doc has been ready to go into final processing for nearly 4 > > months now... > > > > Joe > > > > On 11/28/2012 3:19 PM, Joe Touch wrote: > >> Hi, Nevil, > >> > >> An update draft-touch-tcp-ao-nat-04 has been submitted and should appear > >> in the drafts directory shortly. > > (the remainder has been deleted for brevity)