RE: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



All April 1 RFCs should not be categorised historical but 
Category: CLASSIFIED TOP SECRET EYES ONLY NEED TO KNOW SIPRNET COBRA VATICAN FNORD KNITTING PATTERN
Distribution: Unlimited.

We should also start a December 25 series. With something on SOCKS.

Lloyd Wood
http://sat-net.com/L.Wood/


________________________________________
From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Elwyn Davies [elwynd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 06 April 2013 21:26
To: Stewart Bryant (stbryant)
Cc: ietf; Abdussalam Baryun
Subject: Re: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April    the     first

Right.. they are mind expanding drugs.  Essential for keeping us sane.

/Elwyn

Sent from my ASUS Pad

"Stewart Bryant (stbryant)" <stbryant@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
>
>Sent from my iPad
>
>On 6 Apr 2013, at 14:04, "Abdussalam Baryun" <abdussalambaryun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>
>> If the date is
>> special then thoes RFCs SHOULD be *historical*.
>>
>
>Surely the correct requirement is :
>
>If the date is special then those RFCs MUST be *hysterical*.
>
>- Stewart
>
>
>
>





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]