Re: Sufficient email authentication requirements for IPv6

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



At 07:57 30-03-2013, Livingood, Jason wrote:
Mail acceptance for IPv4 worked inclusively - receivers accept unless IP
reputation or other factors failed. IMHO with IPv6 that model may need to
be turned around to an exclusive one - so receivers will not accept mail
unless certain factors are met (like domain-based authentication or the
IPv6 address is on a whitelist). I'd expect MAAWG will continue to be a

Some receivers currently rely on DNSBLs to decide for them whether to accept a message or not. A number of these DNSBLs only offer support for IPv4 addresses. I assume that these DNSBLs do not know how to handle IPv6 addresses. Changing the email model to one where there is prior agreement or else the receiver will reject the message ignores one of the fundamentals which has made email a success.

At 15:46 30-03-2013, Douglas Otis wrote:
Current domain based strategies such as SPF offer fragile dependence on return path parameters that may incur a large number of transactions to resolve authorizations. Use

That is how SPF works. I presume that persons who are commenting about SPF will be reviewing the updated version of the specification to see whether it works like that or not.

Permission for this occurs by leaving the future of email primarily in the hands of those having conflicts of interest. For example, none of the current domain based schemes

There are conflicts of interest on every side. Things usually do not work well when people cannot make a gesture of good faith.

And again, I call on the IETF to work on this problem.

That sounds like a call for individuals who are easily cheated, deceived, or imposed upon to work on the problem. :-)

Regards,
-sm



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]