RE: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: <elwynd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <jmh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections
From: <l.wood@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 21:45:58 +0000
Accept-language: en-US, en-GB
Acceptlanguage: en-US, en-GB
Cc: ietf@xxxxxxxx, abdussalambaryun@xxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1364234134.23866.4731.camel@mightyatom>
Thread-index: Ac4pgoNB2T/UBo3gRVGKiHSot0DKRwAH59gH
Thread-topic: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections

RFCs say how, but rarely why.

Lloyd Wood
http://sat-net.com/L.Wood/


________________________________________


Elwyn said
> As regards 'history': RFCs record 'state' and not history.  That isn't

References:
- Re: [manet] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-sec-threats-02.txt
  - From: Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: [manet] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-sec-threats-02.txt
  - From: Jiazi Yi
- Re: [manet] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-sec-threats-02.txt
  - From: Abdussalam Baryun
- On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections (was: Re: [manet] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-sec-threats-02.txt)
  - From: John Curran
- Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections (was: Re: [manet] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-sec-threats-02.txt)
  - From: SM
- Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections (was: Re: [manet] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-sec-threats-02.txt)
  - From: Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections (was: Re: [manet] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-sec-threats-02.txt)
  - From: Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections
  - From: Joel M. Halpern

Prev by Date: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2560bis-15
Next by Date: Re: [pkix] Last Call: <draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2560bis-15.txt> (X.509 Internet Public Key Infrastructure Online Certificate Status Protocol - OCSP) to Proposed Standard
Previous by thread: Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections
Next by thread: Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]