Re: Diversity of IETF Leadership

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le 2013-03-11 à 13:43, Arturo Servin <arturo.servin@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :

> Hi,
> 
> 	I have been reading the comments in the list and although I am not
> making a specific reply to any message I would like to make some comments.
> 
> 	So far I have read "I agree we need some diversity" or "I agree that
> more diversity is better". Also I have read "Please no quotas", "do not
> let the nomcom do this" or "that".
> 
> 	My opinion is that we agree we have a situation that we should improve,
> but also we shouldn't focus on the nomcom process, the problem is not
> about how we select people (it may help but it is not the root problem).
> The problem is to bring new people (younger people, women, from more
> countries, different languages, etc.) to write RFCs, to participate/be
> interested in the IETF and how we involve/prepare these people to become
> our leaders and not just participants. If we do that, then we will have
> more diversity in our leadership.

agree.

Marc.

> 
> 	
> Best wishes,
> as
> 
> On 10/03/2013 06:22, IETF Diversity wrote:
>> The letter below was sent to the IESG, the IAB, the IAOC and the ISOC
>> Board this morning, in an attempt to open a discussion of how to
>> increase the diversity of the IETF Leadership.  We are sharing the
>> letter here to encourage community discussion of this important topic.
>> 
>> If you support this letter and would like to be added as a signatory,
>> please send e-mail to ietf.diversity@xxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:ietf.diversity@xxxxxxxxx>, and your name will be added to the
>> list of signatures.
>> 
>> ---
>> 
>> ** An Open Letter to the IESG, the IAB, the IAOC and the ISOC Board **
>> 
>> Dear Members of the IETF Leadership,
>> 
>> We would like to call your attention to an issue that weakens the
>> IETF's decision-making process and calls into question the
>> legitimacy of the IETF as an International Standards Development
>> Organization: the lack of diversity of the IETF leadership.
>> 
>> In addition to the moral and social issues involved, diversity of
>> leadership across several axes (race, geographic location, gender
>> and corporate affiliation) is important for three practical reasons:
>> 
>>    - It is a well-established fact that diverse groups are smarter
>>      and make better decisions than less-diverse groups. 
>> 
>>    - Lack of diversity in our leadership becomes a self-perpetuating
>>      problem, because people who are not represented in the IETF
>>      leadership are less likely to dedicate their time and effort to
>>      the IETF.
>> 
>>    - The lack of diversity in the IETF leadership undermines our
>>      credibility and challenges our legitimacy as an International
>>      Standards Development Organization.
>> 
>> Unfortunately, despite a substantial increase in the number of IETF
>> leadership positions (from 25 to 32) and increasingly diverse
>> attendance at IETF meetings, the diversity of the IETF leadership has
>> not improved.  In fact, it seems to have dropped significantly over
>> the past ten years.
>> 
>> For example, ten years ago, in February of 2003, there were 25 members
>> of the IETF leadership (12 IAB members and 13 IESG members).  Of those
>> 25 members, there was one member of non-European descent, there was one 
>> member from a country outside of North America or Europe, and there were 
>> four women.  There were 23 companies represented in the IETF leadership
>> (out of a total of 25 seats).
>> 
>> In February of 2013, there were 32 members of the IETF leadership
>> (12 IAB members, 15 IESG members and 5 IAOC members).  Of those 32
>> members, there was one member of non-European descent, there were no 
>> members from countries outside of North America or Europe, and there 
>> was only one woman.  There were only 19 companies represented (out of 
>> a total of 32 seats).
>> 
>> It is important to the continued relevance and success of the IETF
>> that we address this issue and eliminate whatever factors are
>> contributing to the lack of diversity in our leadership.  We believe
>> that this is an important and urgent issue that requires your
>> immediate attention.
>> 
>> There are several steps that could be taken, in the short-term within
>> our existing BCPs, to address this problem:
>> 
>>     - Each of the IETF leadership bodies (the IESG, IAB and IAOC)
>>       could update the qualifications that they submit to the
>>       Nominations Committee (through the IAD) to make it clear that
>>       the Nominations Committee should actively seek to increase the
>>       diversity of that body in terms of race, geographic location,
>>       gender and corporate affiliation.
>> 
>>     - Each of the confirming bodies (the ISOC Board for the IAB, the
>>       IAB for the IESG, and the IESG for the IAOC) could make a
>>       public statement at the beginning of each year's nominations
>>       process that they will not confirm a slate unless it
>>       contributes to increased diversity within the IETF leadership,
>>       or it is accompanied by a detailed explanation of what
>>       steps were taken to select a more diverse slate and why it was
>>       not possible to do so.
>> 
>>     - The ISOC President could continue to select Nominations
>>       Committee Chairs who understand the value of diversity and are
>>       committed to increasing the diversity of the IETF.
>> 
>>     - The Nominations Committee could be offered resources or
>>       training on the value of diversity, techniques to recruit a
>>       more diverse candidate pool, and/or information about how to
>>       minimize conflict-of-interest and personal bias in their
>>       selection process.
>> 
>> We also feel that more substantial and longer-term changes may be
>> needed to fully address this issue.  Therefore, we request that the
>> new IETF Chair assemble a design team (with diverse membership, of
>> course) to determine the causes of this problem and to make
>> suggestions for longer-term solutions to be considered by the IETF.
>> 
>> We are committed to working within the IETF to make the changes
>> that are needed to correct this serious issue.
>> 
>> Best Regards,
>> 
>> (In alphabetical order)
>> 
>> Bernard Aboba
>> Cathy Aronson
>> Alia Atlas
>> Mary Barnes
>> Mohamed Boucadair
>> Brian Carpenter
>> Stuart Cheshire
>> Alissa Cooper
>> Spencer Dawkins
>> Roni Even
>> Janet Gunn
>> Stephen Hanna
>> Ted Hardie
>> Sam Hartman
>> Fangwei Hu
>> Geoff Huston
>> Christian Jacquenet
>> Mirjam Kuehne
>> Olaf Kolkman
>> Suresh Krishnan
>> Barry Leiba
>> Ted Lemon
>> Kepeng Li
>> Dapeng Liu
>> Allison Mankin
>> Bill Manning
>> Kathleen Moriarty
>> Monique Morrow
>> Nurani Nimpuno
>> Matt Nottingham
>> Erik Nordmark
>> Karen O'Donoghue
>> Iuniana Oprescu
>> Jaqueline Queiroz
>> Hosnieh Rafiee
>> Pete Resnick
>> Lea Roberts
>> Simon Pietro Romano
>> Peter Saint-Andre
>> Eve Schooler
>> Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
>> Larissa Shapiro
>> Melinda Shore
>> Barbara Stark
>> Brian Trammel
>> Tina Tsou
>> Justin Uberti
>> Margaret Wasserman
>> Renee Wilson-Burstein
>> James Woodyatt
>> Lucy Yong
>> Jessica Yu
>> Lixia Zhang
>> 




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]