Re: Comments on draft-shafranovich-mime-sql-03

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> The question is what happens when the SQL file itself carries no
>> charset information, such as when using "mysql-dump" with the
>> "--skip-set-charset" option. According to MYSQL, UTF-8 would be used
>> in v5.1+ and ASCII in versions prior to that. Perhaps, we should leave
>> "charset" as an optional parameter for cases like these, and just take
>> out the default value.
>
> That sounds to me like the way to go.  Perhaps a "MUST use" the
> charset parameter when the SQL file carries no charset information,
> "MUST NOT use" otherwise?
>

MUST may be an overkill, especially in cases where the web server has
no way of knowing what the charset is or whether it is present. I
would think that SHOULD USE and SHOULD NOT USE maybe a better
alternative.

Yakov


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]