On 2/3/13 1:04 PM, Scott Brim wrote:
On 02/03/13 11:29, "Lixia Zhang" <lixia@xxxxxxxxxxx> allegedly wrote:
I believe what AB suggested is a historical record specifically for each
WG: what you started with, what you went through, how you ended, what you
have learned, both principles and lessons.
90% of that is meeting notes. Everyone keeps good meeting notes, right?
(:-p). The rest, well, the chairs could write it at WG closure and
probably not get any significant complaints.
Having responded to an appeal associated with handling of a WG document,
there can easily be 2000k worth of messages sitting in the archives
arcoss multiple lists for a given document.