Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: sm+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 12:44:47 +0100
Cc: ietf <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Hi Moonesamy,

I also think similar with Carpenter, why reclassify to historic.
rfc2050 is still valid, and why limiting the ietf?

AB

Prev by Date: Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt
Next by Date: draft-moonesamy-mail-list-protocol-00
Previous by thread: Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt
Next by thread: Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]