On Nov 30, 2012, at 2:10 PM, Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > John C Klensin <john-ietf@xxxxxxx> writes: > >> I think changing the default is fine. I'd also be reluctant to >> see the "normal" HTML version go away immediately but would be >> especially reluctant to see the plain text version go away or >> even become less accessible (require more clicks or searching to >> navigate too). > > I suspect we can all agree that this would be optimal: > > 1) have the tools version be the default (my original statement) > 2) have the html version still present > 3) have the text version still present > 4) produce an xml version for better parsing > (ever try and write an agenda app? Half your time is spent writing a > .txt or .html parser) s/xml/json/ Ever try writing an XML app? Half your time is spent writing a .xml parser.