Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/27/2012 01:00 PM, Barry Leiba wrote:
This brings up a question that I have as an AD: A number of times since I started in this position in March, documents have come to the IESG that prompted me (or another AD) to look into the document history for... to find that there's basically no history. We see a string of versions posted, some with significant updates to the text, but *no* corresponding mailing list discussion. Nothing at all. The first we see of the document on the mailing list is a working group last call message, which gets somewhere between zero and two responses (which say "It's ready."), and then it's sent to the responsible AD requesting publication. When I ask the responsible AD or the document shepherd about that, the response is that, well, no one commented on the list, but it was discussed in the face-to-face meetings. A look in the minutes of a few meetings shows that it was discussed, but, of course, the minutes show little or none of the discussion. We accept that, and we review the document as usual, accepting the document shepherd's writeup that says that the document has "broad consensus of the working group." So here's my question: Does the community want us to push back on those situations?

Please, please, please push back on those discussions.

Far too many documents are being represented as WG consensus, and then IETF consensus, when there's nothing of the sort. This degrades the overall quality of IETF output, confuses the community of people who use IETF standards, and potentially does harm to the Internet by promoting use of protocols that haven't been carefully vetted.

Simply presenting a document at a face-to-face meeting and asking people to raise hands or hum in approval isn't sufficient. A necessary condition for IESG consideration of a WG document should be that several people have posted to the WG mailing list that they've read it, and that they consider it desirable and sound.

Keith





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]