+1 Thank all for the insightful discussion that took place around this draft. Your feedback will be carefully considered to progress the work and we welcome any further comment/feedback/help. :-) ciao Luigi On 27 Nov. 2012, at 14:30 , Brian Haberman <brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I want to thank everyone who has provided feedback on this draft. Given the issues raised, I am sending the draft back to the LISP WG for additional work. I encourage folks interested in this draft to participate on the LISP mailing list. > > Regards, > Brian > > On 11/13/12 9:45 AM, The IESG wrote: >> >> The IESG has received a request from the Locator/ID Separation Protocol >> WG (lisp) to consider the following document: >> - 'LISP EID Block' >> <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> as Informational RFC >> >> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits >> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the >> ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2012-11-27. Exceptionally, comments may be >> sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the >> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. >> >> Abstract >> >> >> This is a direction to IANA to allocate a /16 IPv6 prefix for use >> with the Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP). The prefix will be >> used for local intra-domain routing and global endpoint >> identification, by sites deploying LISP as EID (Endpoint IDentifier) >> addressing space. >> >> >> >> >> The file can be obtained via >> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block/ >> >> IESG discussion can be tracked via >> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block/ballot/ >> >> >> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lisp mailing list >> lisp@xxxxxxxx >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp >> > > _______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list > lisp@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp