> From: "George, Wes" <wesley.george@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Allocation != reservation.
> You're hairsplitting on semantics in a way that is mostly unhelpful to
> the discussion at hand.
I _thought_ that the point of the messages from Geoff and others (who were
questioning about how there were no details in the document of how the
allocation would work) was about _how_ the space was to be handed out - to
which the allocation/reservation distinction _is_ important.
Noel